It’s a cool experience, but it will NOT make or break your legal career. It’s totally ok to decide you aren’t going to think about clerkships until (1) next year or (2) never. I know there are a lot of information gaps in the process this is meant to help, not to freak you out. In case anyone else has these questions, I thought I’d send this out. Yeah, the Bristow Fellowship is like SCOTUS in that the right people can push their candidates even if those candidates don't have the OMG paper application you might expect.Advice from Corrine Snow, former President of the Harvard Federalist SocietyĪfter meeting with a bunch of people on campus last week, I realized that there are a lot of 1Ls with the same questions about clerkships. I doubt many people self-select out, this person certainly does not support the Trump admin, as it's not a political position, and the school would lose their mind if they thought someone with a real shot was giving it up for that reason. It's insanely competitive, probably more so than SCOTUS because there are so many fewer spots. They also were incredibly well connected before law school. I know one of this year's Bristow Fellows very well and they not only absolutely have SCOTUS credentials, they also had every professor and administrator at the school with real sway making constant calls, along with uniform support from their judge(s). No idea on whether two clerkships or one is more prevalent among Bristows, although I doubt two hurts Tippy top grades (from the usual lineup of schools) as well as a feeder or semi-feeder AIII clerkship. Out of curiosity, what are the Bristow credential requirements? Do they normally have two clerkships under their belt, like most SCOTUS clerks? Or do they take people with just one clerkship?Īll this is public info since ATL does posts on Bristow hiring but AFAIK it’s the same credentials as SCOTUS (you can probably argue it’s more competitive in some ways since there are only 4 spots, although there also may be people who self-select out due to not wanting to work in the SG’s office depending on the administration at that time). My grades fall into those categories, although I am not dead set on gunning for SCOTUS clerkship just yet. I think which circuit you want to practice in is also a consideration so is whether the 2/9 clerkship is in the specific city you want to practice in (or if not, is it still a "prestigious" or fun city like NYC or SF compared to like New Haven or Billings for example). Which seems like a more enjoyable experience with a better boss? How are the hours? That'd probably be dispositive for me (who is not a realistic SCOTUS candidate) if the choice was between Chin and Kethledge for example. I doubt anyone would hold it against you if you did something like Thomas (CA9) > Srinivasan > biglaw, for example. How are your SCOTUS chances? If you are like top 5% at HYSCCN + LR (or like top 3-5 people at UVA, Penn, Duke, Michigan) I'd probably take the semi-feeder if you don't want to clerk again if you are open to another clerkship I'd take the better experience and just try to tack on a full-fledged feeder afterward (or one of the D.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |